I wrote something about this on the personal blog I was keeping at the time, and the issue came up recently in a book study group at Bethany, so I thought I'd post the story again. It's three years old, but still very relevant:
________________________
By now most people have heard about the legal troubles of Atlanta Falcons quarterback, Michael Vick, who is charged with involvement in illegal dogfighting. He is in some serious, potentially career-damaging trouble and has become a punching bag for many public commentators. Apparently dog fighting is one of the most intolerable sins for many in pop culture.
But what really strikes me is the disparity between the Vick scandal and a recent news story about another famous NFL quarterback, Tom Brady, three-time Superbowl champion for the New England Patriots. Brady's story, which seems to be anything but scandalous to those reporting it, is that he got his girlfriend, Bridget Moynahan, pregnant, but then the couple broke up. As it turns out, nine months wasn't too short a time for Brady to find a new girlfriend, whom he's now with while the old one is giving birth to his first child.
Here's the link to an article on Brady's story in the Boston Globe: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2007/08/23/its_a_boy_for_bridget_moynahan_and_tom_brady/
Of course what Michael Vick did was bad, but if there is any such thing as chastity--if there is any standard of sexual decency and any value in a man and woman actually trying to live as husband and wife to the child they give birth to, then what Brady did was worse. I'm not saying either of these men should be demonized for their mistakes (though many have not hesitated to demonize Vick). I just can't understand why dog fighting is seen as such a perverse thing while fathering a child from philandering is smiled upon?
MM
2 comments:
You make a valid point and I agree that immoral behavior should not be celebrated. However, I will say that I wouldn't call a 3 year relationship "philandering" and for the record, I believe he is now married to the new girl friend.
Since I don't think you are arguing the point concerning Michael Vick, I won't dwell on it. We agree that he did something illegal and paid the price for it. Your argument is that at the same time, Tom Brady was being applauded for his immoral behavior. Agreed, he shouldn't be put on a pedestal for impregnating his girlfriend. In his defense, the article doesn't point out who ended the relationship. It is very possible it was the girlfriend. Secondly, the article is celebrating a birth, not the act that brought it about. Yes, there was a time that nothing would have been mentioned and the child would have lived with labels of illegitimate and bastard. Imagine the headlines if he had ignored the birth of his child. I guess it just depends on how you look at it. Should we dwell on the sin or celebrate the life?
L'Chaim !!
Post a Comment